MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127252481

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on mental-health and academic performance in Canadian university students

2025· preprint· W7127252481 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ena Michelle Ast, Ben Eppinger, Nathalie Germain, Maxine Profitt

Bibliographic record

VenueEdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthPsychosocialPandemicAnxietyStressorSocioeconomic statusSubstance use
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruptions to the educational system since its onset in March 2020, leading to school closures and shifts to remote learning, inconsistent access to educational resources, as well as increased stress and mental health problems for both students and educators alike. These challenges have contributed to learning losses and declines in academic performance at the secondary school level. Data on the pandemic's impact on post-secondary learning outcomes is less consistent, with some studies reporting increases in academic performance, while others report declines. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the pandemic's impact on university students’ academic, mental and psychosocial functioning. Utilizing longitudinal data collected prior to the pandemic (from March 2019 to March 2020), and one year into the pandemic (March 2021-April 2021), we analyze changes in GPA, mental well-being, substance use, social networks, and subjective socioeconomic status. Additionally, we examined the predictors of educational attainment and substance use during the pandemic. Results show that while student’s GPA increased during the pandemic, social networks, and reported well-being decreased, while substance use increased. Substance use turned out to be the only significant predictor of academic performance during the pandemic, while all other indices of mental health- including general anxiety and depressive symptoms as well as stressors unique to the pandemic- were not significantly related to academic outcomes. Notably, changes in substance use from before and after the pandemic’s onset were significantly predicted by pre-existing mental health conditions suggesting that individuals with mental health challenges were more vulnerable to increased substance use and maladaptive coping during this period. Overall, these findings highlight the need for increased resources to support students' mental health and coping skills during crises, particularly for those with existing mental health vulnerabilities, which in turn can foster academic success and mitigate disruptions to their educational progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdArXiv (OSF Preprints)Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207