MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Construction-D’ Lattices Based on Raptor Codes for Unconstrained AWGN Channels

2025· article· W7127333907 on OpenAlexaff
Pegah Sharifi, Khadijeh Bagheri, Hassan Khodaiemehr, Chen Feng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaptor codeAdditive white Gaussian noiseDecoding methodsOnline codesCoding (social sciences)Encoding (memory)Block codeLuby transform codeTurbo code

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Raptor codes provide low encoding and decoding complexity, making them effective in unreliable networks. This paper introduces a novel framework for constructing multilevel lattices using Raptor codes, integrating Construction-D’ to enhance joint coding and modulation. We employ a multilevel decoder with Belief Propagation (BP) and concatenate Luby Transform (LT) codes with quasi-cyclic low-density parity-check (QC-LDPC) pre-codes, streamlining the construction process. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed Raptor lattices significantly outperform traditional counterparts in Frame Error Rate (FER) over additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207