Solid-State Transformer Framework for FIDVR Mitigation and LVRT Capability Enhancement in PV-Integrated Transmission Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Critical motors in power systems are particularly vulnerable to voltage disturbances such as Fault-Induced Delayed Voltage Recovery (FIDVR), which is characterized by voltage dips and extended recovery periods. These issues can lead to motor stalling, industrial disruptions, and costly interruptions. This paper proposes a novel solid-state transformer (SST) control strategy to mitigate FIDVR, enhance motor stability, and improve low-voltage ride-through (LVRT) capability in systems with largescale photovoltaic (PV) integration. The SST employs advanced control techniques to dynamically manage active and reactive power, ensuring voltage stabilization, preventing motor stalling during faults, and maintaining system reliability. Unlike conventional solutions such as STATCOMs or SVCs, the SST integrates seamlessly with PV systems, offering superior fault mitigation and performance in renewable energy integration. Furthermore, the SST approach adheres to LVRT grid codes, ensuring compliance with voltage stability standards during fault events. MATLAB/Simulink simulations in a realistic gridconnected PV system validate the proposed approach, demonstrating its effectiveness in stabilizing voltage, maintaining critical motor operation, and addressing FIDVR. The results highlight significant improvements in system reliability, reduced downtime, and enhanced adaptability to increasing renewable penetration, establishing the SST as a transformative solution for modern power systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".