Lire Rimbaud : Approches critiques. Hommages à James R. Lawler. Préface d’YVES BONNEFOY. Textes réunis par PAUL PERRON et SERGIO VILLANI. Toronto, Canadian Scholars’Press Inc., 2000. Un vol. 15 × 22,5 de XVI-328 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le monde moderne est-il pensable sans le roman ? Le roman est-il pensable sans le monde moderne? Répondre « non » à ces deux questions signifie s’engager à donner des explicatins. Il romanzo de Franco Moretti fait l’un et l’autre, et s’en donne les moyens, dans une impressionnante œuvre collective en cinq volumes, avec plus de deux cents collaborateurs, qui est en cours de publication chez Einaudi, à Turin.A ce jour, les deux premiers volumes sont parus, le troisième est sous presse. Cet article expose les ambitions intellectuelles et les principes de composition de cette somme théorique et critique sur le roman, analysé comme phénomène culturel majeur de notre temps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".