MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improved Stability Based on Lyapunov-Hamiltonian Control Law for Multi-Segment Converters in DC Microgrids Interconnections

2025· article· W7127435939 on OpenAlexaff
Phatiphat Thounthong, Tatapong Phondee, Wuttikai Tammawan, Burin Yodwong, Nicu Bizon, Gianpaolo Vitale, Serge Pierfederici, Babak Nahid-Mobarakeh, Pongsiri Mungporn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridControl theory (sociology)ConvertersTest benchController (irrigation)Stability (learning theory)Power (physics)Constant (computer programming)Voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a robust control strategy for enhancing the large-signal stability of DC microgrids with interconnected multi-segment converters. An improved Lyapunov-Hamiltonian Control Law (LHCL) is proposed to regulate the dynamic behavior of interleaved Boost/Buck converters supplied by fuel cells. By exploiting port-Hamiltonian modeling and integrating Lyapunov-based damping, the controller dynamically adapts to varying load conditions, particularly under challenging constant power load (CPL) scenarios. The proposed method ensures global stability by shaping energy flow and minimizing oscillations through analytically derived damping terms. Experimental validation on a test bench equipped with a real-time dSPACE controller demonstrates the superior performance of the LHCL approach under both constant resistance and CPL disturbances. The results confirm the method’s effectiveness in maintaining voltage stability, achieving current balancing, and ensuring robust energy management in DC microgrid interconnections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207