MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7127436800 · doi:10.51825/tjil.v4i2.35192

Liability of Airline for Pilot's Action Causing Delay: A Study of United Airlines Flight UA-198

2025· article· W7127436800 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Farrell Sudarma, Saniyah El Ismah

Bibliographic record

VenueTirtayasa Journal of International Law · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiabilityStatutory lawNormativeConventionAction (physics)WarrantyControl (management)Legal liability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article 19 of the Montreal Convention 1999 establishes airline liability for delays causing passenger or baggage damage unless caused by unavoidable circumstances, balancing passenger rights and carrier accountability. This study examines liability for delays stemming from pilot actions, exemplified by United Airlines Flight UA 198’s diversion to San Francisco due to a pilot forgetting to bring his passport onboard, stranding passengers for six hours. A normative legal methodology forms the basis of this study. The analysis draws upon data obtained from primary and secondary sources through the application of statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis confirms that airlines bear responsibility for the pilot’s conduct under Article 19 of the Montreal Convention 1999, as pilots’ operational control falls within carriers’ domain. Such a situation reflects the Convention's broader intention to ensure that airlines maintain full oversight over their personnel and operational obligations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTirtayasa Journal of International Law→Same topicInternational Law and Aviation→French-language works237,207→