MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127595140 · doi:10.3917/rhlf.074.0957j

MICHEL DE PURE, Épigone, Histoire du siècle futur . Édition établie par LISE LEIBACHER-OUVRARD et DANIEL MAHER. Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval, 2005, collection de la République des Lettres, série « Sources ». Un vol. 15 × 23 de 235 p.

2008· article· fr· W7127595140 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire littéraire de la France · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Power (physics)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 9 avril 1845 Victor Hugo écrit au représentant du roi de Suède à Paris, le comte G. C. F. Löwenhjelm en lui confiant deux exemplaires de Notre-Dame de Paris destinés au roi Oscar Ier et au secrétaire perpétuel de l’Académie suédoise, Bernhard von Beskow. Par sa date et son contenu, cette lettre se rattache à la correspondance de Hugo avec Beskow publiée dans le numéro précédent de la RHLF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire littéraire de la FranceSame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207