Par-delà les augmentations de salaire : comment les milieux de travail syndiqués du secteur privé se sont-ils adaptés au manque de main-d’œuvre au Québec ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article aborde les façons dont les milieux de travail du secteur privé syndiqué québécois se sont adaptés au manque de la main-d’oeuvre observé récemment. Basée sur des données qualitatives et quantitatives originales, l’analyse montre que les répercussions des pénuries se sont fait sentir sur la négociation collective, la convention, l’organisation du travail, les conditions du travail ainsi que la vie syndicale. Les acteurs du milieu de travail ont dû adapter pragmatiquement leurs pratiques en réaction aux perturbations découlant du manque de main-d’oeuvre. L’originalité de cette recherche vient de sa perspective large des répercussions des tensions du marché du travail sur les milieux de travail mettant en évidence des répercussions inexplorées et inédites, positives ou négatives sur les employeurs, les syndicats et les travailleurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".