MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Role of a telemedicine network provided by local pharmacies in the prevention and early management of cardiovascular events

2025· article· en· W7127667019 on OpenAlexaff
M G De Angelis, M Di Pasquale, M Amarante, L Assoni, Elisa Brangi, Miguel Ángel Mazzini, C Tomasi, Gianbattista Bollani, Fulvio Glisenti, Marco Cossolo, F Gabbrielli, S Nodari

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemedicinePharmacyEmergency departmentTelematicsTelehealthHealth careChest painMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background As traditional healthcare systems face increasing demand, telemedicine, leveraging telecommunications to deliver healthcare remotely, has emerged as a promising alternative to enhance accessibility and reduce costs. However, evidence supporting its effectiveness in real-world applications remains limited. Purpose The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a pharmacy-based telemonitoring network evaluating its potential role in chronic as well as in the acute setting, by enhancing the appropriateness of referrals to the emergency department (ED). Methods Our Department of Cardiology, in collaboration with our National Association of Pharmacists and the Italian National Institute of Health, has implemented a telematic network currently involving 7056 pharmacies throughout the country connected to a single telemedicine platform (Health Telematic Network - HTN). Pharmacies are equipped to perform 12-lead ECGs, ABPM, and Holter ECGs. Exams are performed either for routine check-ups or when a patient presents with cardiac symptoms. Demographic and clinical data are collected, and then transmitted through the platform for real-time cardiological evaluation: if any abnormalities are detected, pts are referred either for further diagnostic investigations or clinical evaluation, or, in cases of life-threatening conditions, to the ED. We analyzed all the ECGs performed from February 2022 to 2023 totalling 266602 procedures and then conducted a retrospective review of ED referrals due to chest pain to assess the appropriateness of ED referral. Results Out of 266602 ECGs analyzed 89% were performed for routine check-ups, 11% were prompted by specific cardiac symptoms. Common abnormalities identified included: AV blocks (1st degree: 5849 pts; 2nd degree: 78 pts, 3rd degree: 40 pts); bundle branch block (LBBB: 2768 pts; RBBB 1522 pts); bifascicular block (1072 pts); atrial fibrillation (AF) (3988 pts); severe QT prolongation ( > 500 msec) (195 pts); ST segment depression (176 pts) and ST segment elevation (151 pts). Referral to the ED was required in 1987 cases. The most common reason for ED referral was AF, accounting for 49.6% of the total; chest pain was identified as the second most prevalent cause (29.6% of the total). The retrospective analysis of ED referrals due to chest pain indicated that 71.2% of the cases had been appropriate. Finally, cost-effectiveness analysis estimated potential savings of 2’219’661 € for the hospital, based on an average cost of 207 € for each chest pain diagnostic work-up in the ED. Conclusion Our findings highlight the potential role of pharmacy-based telemonitoring network both in chronic care (primary and secondary prevention) as well as in the acute setting, by enhancing the appropriateness of referrals to the emergency department (ED).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→French-language works237,207→