MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127673919 · doi:10.3917/rhlf.061.0167b

MARIE-CLAUDE MALENFANT et SABRINA VERVACKE, éds., « Écrire et conter ». Mélanges de rhétorique et d’histoire littéraire du XVI e siècle offerts à Jean-Claude Moisan . Québec, Les Presses de l’Université Laval (Les collections de la République des Lettres), 2003. Un vol. de 252 p.

2006· article· fr· W7127673919 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruno Méniel

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire littéraire de la France · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Field (mathematics)Term (time)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fougeret de Monbron à la Bastille, et dans ses archives Fougeret de Monbron a séjourné deux fois dans les prisons de Louis XV et notamment à la Bastille du 12 avril au 25 septembre 1755. Sa présence dans la forteresse a donné naissance à un certain nombre de documents dispersés et partiellement reproduits. On propose une mise au point, de nouvelles transcriptions et la publication des derniers inédits. Les archives de la Bastille fournissent des informations sur la vie du prisonnier et permettent de préciser le profil d’un homme de lettres à la singularité très accusée. L’examen plus particulier de la « bibliothèque de voyage » saisie lors de son arrestation donne de précieuses indications pour compléter la bibliographie de l’écrivain cosmopolite, amateur de littérature étrangère et sans doute traducteur de l’anglais. Les archives permettent aussi de dénouer certaines confusions tissées entre la biographie de Fougeret et celle d’un autre prisonnier de la Bastille, Louis-Joseph de La Rochegérault. Il faut rendre à ce dernier La Voie des persécutés régulièrement donné au premier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire littéraire de la FranceSame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207