MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7127747542

Şanlıurfa Müzesi’nde Bulunan Artuklu Dönemine Ait Bir Grup Sikke

2020· article· tr· W7127747542 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ercan ÇALIŞ

Bibliographic record

VenueVan Yüzüncü Yıl University Academic Data Management System · 2020
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Period (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Şanlıurfa, one of the most developed cities of the Southeastern Anatolia Region, is adjacent to Diyarbakır in the northeast, Adıyaman in the northwest, Syria in the south, Mardin in the east and Gaziantep in the west.Dating back to the Paleolithic period, Şanlıurfa has gained an important place with the recent excavations in terms of world history and art.In history, Şanlıurfa is one of the oldest settlements of the region, which was called the Mesopotamia.The excavations in Göbekli Tepe, located in the village of Örencik that is close to the city center of the region, which has hosted many civilizations throughout the ages, resulted in the rewriting of the history, art, social and cultural history of the mankind.The architectural structures, which were excavated in Göbekli tepe and dated back to 10000 B.C. by the researchers, have turned out to be important discoveries in terms of architecture and history of art.Therefore, with the idea that all works carried out in such an important region would be valuable, a group of coins belonging to the Artuqid period in the Şanlıurfa Museum were introduced and interpreted in terms of art history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVan Yüzüncü Yıl University Academic Data Management System→Same topicHistory and Cultural Heritage→French-language works237,207→