MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127766766

SA44B-07 - An updated assimilative CHAIM for near-real-time ionospheric specification:assessing its real-world performance

2021· article· en· W7127766766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benjamin; id_orcid 0000-0002-7998-1037 Reid, David; id_orcid 0000-0003-2567-8187 Themens, Anthony M. McCaffrey, PT Jayachandran

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData assimilationIonosphereEarth's magnetic fieldGNSS applicationsAltimeterArcticGeomagnetic storm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Assimilative Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Model (A-CHAIM) is a near-real-time data assimilation model of ionospheric plasma density above 45 degrees North geomagnetic magnetic latitude. The model assimilates data from ground-based GNSS receivers, ionosondes, and the JASON altimeter satellites, using a particle filter technique. The model has recently been refined, building on two years of nearly continuous operation since 2019. In this study we will use the observation files gathered by the operational system to run the refined A-CHAIM data assimilation model and examine its performance during the May 12, 2021, Kp 7 geomagnetic storm. The modeling and forecasting ability of A-CHAIM will be evaluated by comparing the assimilation to in-situ measurements of topside electron density from the DMSP and Swarm satellites, as well as to manually-scaled ionograms from the Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN), ahead of updating the core A-CHAIM system with the refined model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207