MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of plozasiran in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome: PALISADE - 1 year open label extension

2025· article· en· W7127887253 on OpenAlexaff
G F Watts, R S Rosenson, R A Hegele, I J Goldberg, A Gallo, Ann Mertens, Alexis Baass, R Fu, Ma'An Muhsin, N Leeper, Jennifer Hellawell, D Gaudet

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research InstituteRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypertriglyceridemiaLipoprotein lipaseApolipoprotein BTriglyceridePlaceboPostprandialLipoprotein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (FCS) is a rare genetic dyslipidemia. The core defect is absence or impairment of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, resulting in severe hypertriglyceridemia and an increased risk of acute pancreatitis (AP). Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC3) is an essential regulator of the metabolism of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins through both LPL-dependent and LPL-independent pathways. Plozasiran, a siRNA, targets and silences APOC3 messenger RNA in the liver, thereby reducing ApoC3 production. We report the long-term efficacy and safety of plozasiran in FCS patients. 75 FCS patients from The PALISADE study, a Phase 3, global, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and with fasting TG ≥10 mmol/L (880 mg/dL) on stable, lipid-lowering therapy were randomized 2:1:2:1 to plozasiran (25, 50 mg) or volume-matched placebo administered subcutaneously, quarterly for 12 months before being offered entry into a 2 year ongoing open-label extension during which they transitioned to receive plozasiran 25 mg. 65 patients entered the OLE; the median baseline TG levels were ~24 mmol/L (2103 mg/dL). Median reductions in TG at Month 24 (Month 12 of the OLE, trough prior to next dose) of -76% occurred, achieving median levels of 5 mmol/L (444 mg/dL), with similar levels for those who started on plozasiran during the double-blind period and those who crossed over from placebo. These reductions were associated with reduced median levels of ApoC3 by -89%. Mean LDL-C levels increased consistent with the double-blind period but remained below 1.4 mmol/L (55 mg/dL). Mean HDL-C also increased by 66% to 1.5 mmol/L (27 mg/dL). Reductions of -37% occurred in non-HDL-C to mean levels of 3.9 mmol/L (152 mg/dL). Reductions of -56% occurred in VLDL-C to mean levels of 2.5 mmol/L (98 mg/dL). ApoB levels (71 mg/dL) were well below threshold levels at baseline and remained low at Month 24 (81 mg/dL). 42% of patients reached TG of <500 mg/dL, 66% reached < 880 mg/dL in the OLE period, measured at trough. Key pancreatitis endpoints will be reported. Plozasiran showed a favorable safety profile for annualized event rates consistent with the parent study and other studies to date. Premature discontinuations remained low and did not increase during the OLE period. The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were comparable to those reported in the parent study; most commonly reported were abdominal pain, COVID-19, nasopharyngitis, headache and nausea. Mean HbA1C remained stable in those treated with plozasiran throughout the OLE. Plozasiran demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile in the OLE consistent with other safety data to date. Deep and durable reductions in circulating ApoC3 and TG levels seen in the blinded phase of the study have continued during the first 12 months of the OLE. Plozasiran appears to be a promising new therapy to lower severely elevated plasma TG in patients suffering from FCS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207