MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7127924962 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18494704

The Impact of Voluntary Disclosure Level on the Cost of Equity Capital in an Emerging Capital Market: The Case of the Amman Stock Exchange

2005· dissertation· W7127924962 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAuditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoluntary disclosureCost of capitalCost of equityResidual income valuationEquity capital marketsEquity (law)Stock exchangeInformation asymmetryReturn on capital

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of disclosure levels on the cost of equity capital is a central issue in contemporary accounting research. Economic theory suggests that higher disclosure reduces information asymmetry and estimation risk, thereby lowering the cost of equity capital. However, empirical evidence on this relationship remains limited, is largely focused on developed markets (e.g., the USA and Canada), and reports mixed results. This study examines the impact of voluntary disclosure on the cost of equity capital in the Amman Stock Exchange as an example of an emerging capital market. The analysis is conducted by regressing the cost of equity capital on disclosure levels and other firm characteristics. Disclosure level is measured using a self-constructed disclosure index based on voluntarily disclosed information in the 2000 annual reports of a sample of non-financial companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange. The index comprises three main groups and nine categories. Overall, voluntary disclosure is found to be relatively low, with approximately 81% of the 62 disclosure items exhibiting disclosure levels below 50%. Disclosure practices vary across categories, with background information being the most frequently reported and projected information the least reported. The cost of equity capital is estimated using the residual income model proposed by Gebhardt et al. (2001). The findings show that the average required rate of return is about 10%. The findings reveal a significant negative relationship between voluntary disclosure levels and the cost of equity capital. Firms with higher levels of disclosure experience a reduction in their cost of equity capital ranging between 0.067% and 0.083% compared to less forthcoming firms. Among the disclosure categories, background information and market data exert the strongest influence in explaining variations in the cost of equity capital for Jordanian firms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAuditing, Earnings Management, Governance→French-language works237,207→