MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7127935994 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.292

Novel residual GAN for synthetic T2 mapping from OS-CMR to enhance myocardial edema detection

2025· article· en· W7127935994 on OpenAlexaff
Faezeh lotfikazemi, M G F Friedrich, M B Benovoy, L H Haririsanati, K E Eyre, M L Luu, M C Chetrit

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualPreprocessorPattern recognition (psychology)Parametric statisticsGraphLimiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Myocardial edema is a key factor of acute myocardial injury that substantially impairs microvascular function [1]. Although T2-weighted MRI is essential for identifying this edema, its performance is often compromised by motion artifacts, prolonged acquisition times, and heterogeneous imaging protocols. [2, 3] In contrast, needle-free OS-CMR promising approach to provides functional insights and included T2 information [4-6]. With recent advances in deep learning, especially in generative models [7], the synthesis of medical images has become a promising avenue. This study introduces a novel R-GAN coupled with an edema validation pipeline designed to synthesize T2 parametric maps from OS-CMR, thereby facilitating accurate edema detection. Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a novel R-GAN framework for synthesizing T2 parametric maps from OS-CMR images, enabling precise detection of myocardial edema. Methods Two independent datasets comprising matched OS-CMR and T2-weighted images from 2189 patients were analyzed. Preprocessing steps included normalization, data augmentation, and image registration. The proposed R-GAN (figure1), which incorporates residual blocks, was benchmarked against the Pix2Pix model using performance metrics such as PSNR, SSIM, and PCC. The evaluation focused on both edematous and healthy myocardial regions through signal intensity measurements, Extended Phase Graph (EPG) simulations, and T2 curve analyses performed with Python scripts and CVI42 software (Figure2). Results The R-GAN consistently outperformed the Pix2Pix model across all evaluated metrics. It achieved PSNR values ranging from 21.56 to 24.95 dB and SSIM scores between 0.672 and 0.739, and PCC scores between 0.862 to 0.923 compared to Pix2Pix’s 18.80–19.20 dB and 0.055–0.659 and 0.802 – 0.890, respectively. The edema signal intensity remained robust, with the original values of 452 for the edema ROI and 283 for the healthy ROI closely matching the synthesized values of 459.0 and 269.0, respectively. Extended Phase Graph (EPG) simulations revealed a 99% correlation between the synthesized T2 curves and the original data. Furthermore, analysis of two regions of interest, representing edematous and healthy myocardium, validated the fidelity of the synthetic T2 curves, as demonstrated by error metrics showing MAE values from 0.0007 to 0.0185, RMSE as low as 0.0008, and consistently high R² values (≥0.87). Notably, T2 curves for both edematous and healthy regions exhibited an almost perfect correlation (0.99) between the synthesized and ground truth data. Conclusion The novel R-GAN method demonstrates the feasibility of generating high-quality T2 maps from OS-CMR images, offering a promising non-invasive approach for myocardial edema detection. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.Figure1 Figure2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→