Museum and education. Museum pedagogics. Museum specialist as an educator
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent times have brought into being a new concept of edutainment. More and more museum is valued and evaluated not only as a provider of knowledge but also as a specific place for experience, entertainment and education. Such attitude towards a museum forms the basic concepts of the museum pedagogics which, in its own place, constitutes the theoretical framework of the cultural and educational activities of a museum. In Russia, as well as in Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, USA and other countries, the development of the museum pedagogics is determined by the cultural policy and strategy defining the use of the museum educational potential. A creative laboratory Museum pedagogics was formed in 1990 within the Academy of Continuing Education for the Cultural Workers in Moscow, Russia. The laboratory serves as a dynamic model for educating museum educators who are in charge of cultural and educational activities of a museum. Thanks to the successful and open activities of this laboratory as well as to many conferences in regional museums, interesting educational and amusing programmes targeted at various publics appeared in Russian museums.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it