MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7127969502 · doi:10.4224/40003950

Effects of humidity on the health of occupants of dwelling units: a literature review

2024· report· en· W7127969502 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ashley Nixon, Abdelaziz Laouadi

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2024
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverheating (electricity)HumidityThermal comfortScopusThreshold limit valueIndoor air

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proposed research work sought to address indoor overheating in the 2025 edition of the National Building Code (NBC). The initial phase of the task aimed to address overheating by establishing an acceptable (evidence-based) upper limit value for indoor air temperature in dwelling units. The standing committee on housing and small buildings (SC-HSB) accepted the proposed requirement for an acceptable upper limit indoor air temperature of 26 °C. However, the committee agreed that the proposed change did not adequately address the overheating issue and that further research is needed to understand the interacting effects of indoor humidity and temperature on overheating risk in dwelling units. Study Objective Through multiple meetings with the Overheating Task Group, the research objective evolved to focus on the exploration of the health effects of indoor humidity in dwelling units at non-extreme indoor temperatures (around the proposed value of 26 °C). The objective of this literature review was to better understand the possible effects of indoor humidity at non-extreme warm temperatures around 26 °C on the health of occupants of dwelling units to provide evidence-based technical support for a proposed change to address overheating in the National Building Code of Canada (2025 edition). Method The literature was reviewed using a search strategy in the Scopus database and publications recommended through informal conversations with experts in the field of human adaptation and physiology. Certain reviews were also screened for relevant articles. Inclusion criteria were applied to the potential 3000+ articles. This comprised of having documented indoor humidity measurements, health outcome(s), and having new empirical data. Studies only looking at extreme temperatures above 30 °C were excluded. Health outcomes were divided into three categories; symptoms, morbidity, and mortality. Results The literature search returned 13 studies evaluating the effects of indoor humidity and temperature on human health. Nine studies focused on sleep (as one of heat-related health outcomes), two studies examined symptoms such as sick building syndrome (a condition where building occupants experience acute health/comfort effects linked to time spent in a building) and heat-related symptoms, and two studies characterized morbidity through distress calls for respiratory distress and diabetic crises. As expected, no studies with mortality outcomes met the inclusion criteria. Most studies found an effect of humidity on health (11/13) at varying degrees of temperature; however, the array of possible humidity thresholds cause the question of an indoor upper-limit of humidity to remain unanswered when looking at non-extreme temperatures. The heterogeneity in the results (i.e., wide range in temperature/humidity levels having negative health effects) may stem from methodological limitations or from the variability in study design and outcome measures. Overall, results suggest that: • sleep disturbances may occur as humidity and temperature increase, even below 26°C • respiratory distress may increase with rising humidity, especially over 26°C Conclusion Based on this review, the possibility of negative effects of humidity on health at varying temperatures (> 20 °C) is conceivable. With global warming leading to an increase in environmental water evaporation, resulting in higher humidity across the globe, considerations for the effects of humidity on health may become increasingly relevant. With sleep seemingly being a more vulnerable state for high temperature and humidity, implications REPORT No. A1-024303.1 PAGE 6 as to which indoor space should be thermally controlled and/or during which time period, may be important. It would also be important for ongoing and future research to generate additional data to evaluate the impact of indoor environmental conditions and other confounding parameters on critical heat related health problems. These critical health problems include but are not limited to cardiovascular disease, asthma, diabetes, respiratory diseases, and mental health issues. This review was unable to determine whether indoor humidity has an effect on building occupant health at non-extreme temperatures (< 30 °C). The available scientific evidence supports the proposed requirement for an acceptable upper limit indoor air temperature to sufficiently protect Canadian occupants in dwelling units against overheating risk without explicitly considering the interacting effects of indoor humidity and temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0110.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→French-language works237,207→