MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter may attenuate the association of physical activity with mortality and cardiovascular events

2025· article· en· W7128080610 on OpenAlexaff
J Hao, Z Liu, B Hu, D Wang, S Rangarajan, Y Wang, C Wang, L A Tse, W Liu, S Li, M Yan, Q Cai, S Yusuf, W Li

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolic equivalentPhysical activityCohort studyEpidemiologyProportional hazards modelCohortProspective cohort studyRelative risk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Long-term exposure to PM2.5 and low physical activity are independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, there is limited research investigating the combined effects of PM2.5 exposure and physical activity on CVD risk. Purpose This study aims to examine the interactive effects of long-term PM2.5 exposure and physical activity on incident CVD and mortality. Methods The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE)-China cohort study is a population-based cohort study recruiting participants aged 35–70 years in 12 provinces between 2005 and 2009. PM2.5 exposure was estimated using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Information on physical activity was recorded using the long-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and converted to metabolic equivalent task (MET)-minutes per week. Participants were divided into high and low PM2.5 exposure groups by the median concentration (47.70 μg/m3). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular events. Cox frailty models and restricted cubic splines were used to assess associations. Interaction effects were evaluated using measures of multiplicative and additive interaction, including the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and the proportion attributable to interaction (AP). Results The PURE-China study recruited 47 931 participants, of whom 39 970 are eligible for this analysis. During the median follow-up period of 11.9 years (IQR: 9.6-12.7), 1316 major cardiovascular events and 1084 all-cause deaths occurred in the low-exposure group, compared to 1859 major cardiovascular events and 1048 all-cause deaths in the high-exposure group. In low-exposure areas, higher total physical activity significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome (HR: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.73–0.97, p trend=0.012) and major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.80, 0.67–0.95, p trend=0.022). However, in high-exposure regions, physical activity showed no protective effect for the composite outcome (HR: 0.97, 0.85–1.09, p trend=0.551) and major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.98, 0.85–1.13, p trend=0.864). Higher non-recreational physical activity reduced the risks of composite outcome and major CVD in low-exposure areas but provided no benefit in high-exposure regions (p interaction=0.011, 0.024, respectively). Significant antagonistic interaction was observed between high PM2.5 and low non-recreational physical activity for composite outcome (RERI: -0.215, 95%CI: -0.406 to -0.024; AP: -0.155, 95%CI: -0.294 to -0.017). Conclusion Long-term exposure to high PM2.5 concentrations diminishes the cardiovascular benefits of physical activity, particularly non-recreational activities. These findings underscore the need for tailored physical activity guidelines and air quality interventions in heavily polluted regions to maximize public health benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→