MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7128095533

Multiligament knee injury and dislocation in a 17-year old football player: clinical focus on rehabilitation exercise and return to sport.

2025· article· en· W7128095533 on OpenAlexaff
Noah Lane, George Austin Rees, Kevin D'Angelo

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationFootballFocus (optics)Return to sportKnee DislocationDislocationFootball players
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To highlight the rehabilitation exercises of a football player following surgical reconstruction of a multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) with vascular compromise. Case Presentation: A 17-year-old male high school football player sustained a traumatic MLKI requiring immediate limb saving surgery and subsequent tissue repair. Post-operatively, he engaged in an interdisciplinary phased and structured rehabilitation program with an emphasis on progressive loading, neuromuscular control and return-to-sport (RTS) readiness. At eight months post-op the athlete returned to a United States prepatory school where he transitioned to an external strength and conditioning program. Summary: This case report illustrates the complexities and value of an interdisciplinary and individualized rehabilitation program in the early stages of MLKI recovery. Outcomes were positive through eight months, but there were limitations related to the continuity of care that prevented long-term follow up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques→French-language works237,207→