MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7128095562

Schwannoma causing chronic medial calf pain in a recreational skiing and running athlete: a case report.

2025· article· en· W7128095562 on OpenAlexaff
Madlaina Gruber, Christopher White, Glenn Cashman

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsBurnaby Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchwannomaReferralMedical diagnosisPsychological interventionDifferential diagnosisRehabilitation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Soft tissue masses in the extremities of athletes present commonly in clinical practice. Clinicians focusing on musculoskeletal care will be familiar with common causes such as myofascial trigger points, hematomas and even lipomas, but may overlook less common causes such as benign or metastatic tumours. This paper describes a case of a schwannoma, a benign nerve tumour. Case Presentation: A 28-year-old recreational athlete presented with a five-year history of progressive calf pain and a palpable nodule unresponsive to conservative care. Imaging revealed a well-circumscribed intramuscular mass with vascular features. Surgical excision and histopathology confirmed a schwannoma. Postoperatively, the patient returned to full activity with resolution of pain. Summary: This case underscores the necessity of maintaining a broad differential and reinforces the importance of reevaluating diagnoses when conservative interventions fail. Early recognition and referral for imaging are critical to avoid prolonged mismanagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases→French-language works237,207→