MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7128105788

Creatine and Performance in Males and Females

2000· dissertation· en· W7128105788 on OpenAlexaff
D. MacLennan

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2000
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreatineCreatine kinasePlaceboCreatine MonohydratePhosphateMuscle biopsyIntramuscular injectionPhysical exercise
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Rationale: Creatine phosphate (PCr) is degraded 𝘷𝘪𝘢 the creatine kinase (CK) enzyme to provide energy to rephosphorylate ADP back to ATP during high-intensity muscle contractions. We, and others, have previously shown that dietary creatine (Cr) loading can improve performance in short-duration, high intensity exercise in males and females. An increase in fat-free mass has also been reported, which was higher for males compared to females. It was unknown whether dietary Cr loading increases intramuscular [Cr] equally in both genders. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effect of oral Cr loading upon [PCr] and [Cr] and exercise performance in both males and females. Methods: Twenty-seven healthy young subjects (n = 13 male, n = 14 female) participated in the investigation. Subjects performed an ischemic handgrip test, maximum voluntary contraction of dorsiflexors and knee extensors, a 30 s maximal cycling test (Wingate), and body composition (by DEXA scanning) was determined before and after supplementation with either Cr (n = 13) (5 g by mouth 4 •d⁻¹ x 5 d, followed by 5 g•d⁻¹ x 5 d) or placebo (pl; n = 14). Muscle biopsy samples were obtained before and after supplementation and were assayed for high-energy phosphates ([Cr], [PCr] and [ATP]). Results: Cr supplementation resulted in an increase in intramuscular total creatine concentration [TCr] (pl, 129.9 ± 13.8 to 132.9 ± 10.8 mMol•kg⁻¹ dw; Cr, 129.9 ± 11.6 to 146.4 ± 20.1 mMol•kg⁻¹ dw, p < 0.05) and a difference in [PCr] (pl, 72.8 ± 15.2 to 67.3 ± 4.3 mMol•kg⁻¹ dw; Cr, 70.9 ± 7.4 to 77.1 ± 13.2 mMol•kg⁻¹ dw), but had no effect on [Cr], and no differences in gender were observed. DEXA analysis showed no significant increase in total or fat-free mass; similarly, no improvements in maximum voluntary contractions were observed in either gender. In Wingate testing, males had a significant increase in peak power (pl, 971 ± 72 W to 989 ±76 W versus Cr, 994 ± 174 W to 1042 ± 154 W) and peak power per kilogram of body weight (pl, 12.8 ± 1.3 to 12.9 ± 1.1 W•kg⁻¹; Cr, 11.5 ± 1.1 to 12.1 ± 1.3 W•kg⁻¹) as a result of creatine supplementation, while females showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Creatine monohydrate supplementation at 20 g•d⁻¹ for 5 days resulted in an increase in muscle total creatine concentration for males and females, but did not affect body composition or maximum voluntary contraction. Males showed improved performance in absolute and relative peak power generation with supplementation while females did not. This may suggest that males and females respond differently to Cr supplementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicMuscle metabolism and nutrition→French-language works237,207→