MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128163186 · doi:10.1093/joneph/20.6.668

The native arteriovenous fistula in 2007 Research needs

2007· article· en· W7128163186 on OpenAlexaff
Pietro Ravani, Lawrence M. Spergel, P. Roy-Chaudhury, Arif Asif

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nephrology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVascular accessNephrologyArteriovenous fistulaRisk stratificationIntervention (counseling)Hemodialysis accessTranslational research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Several research questions are open in the field of vascular access for hemodialysis. The present paper reviews both prognostic issues, such as the identification of factors for patient stratification before access insertion, and intervention questions, such as comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical solutions, the effects of different medications on vascular pathology, the different cannulation practices to prevent vessel wall lesions and technologies for early diagnosis of access dysfunction. Given that the quality of the available literature in nephrology is often suboptimal, nephrologists need to pay special attention to methodology issues before embarking on expensive multicenter studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NephrologySame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207