Pathogenic Bacteria In Aquatic Ecosystems: Threats And Mitigation Approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aquatic ecosystems play a crucial role in human health and the environment, yet they are increasingly threatened by pathogenic bacteria originating from sewage, agricultural runoff, and other sources. These waterborne pathogens pose significant public health risks, causing diseases such as cholera, dysentery, and typhoid fever, and contribute to millions of illnesses and deaths annually worldwide (World Health Organization [WHO], 2014). Factors like inadequate sanitation infrastructure in developing regions, climate change-driven shifts in pathogen distribution, and the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria exacerbate the challenges (Fenwick, 2006; Martínez-Urtaza et al., 2023; Larsson & Flach, 2022). This paper reviews the types and sources of pathogenic bacteria found in freshwater and marine environments, the threats they pose to human populations and aquatic life, and current mitigation approaches. Key bacterial pathogens – including Vibrio cholerae, pathogenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Shigella – are discussed alongside their transmission routes and health impacts. The analysis highlights emerging concerns such as climate-related increases in Vibrio infections and the role of microplastics as vectors for pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes. Mitigation strategies are examined, ranging from improved water treatment and sanitation systems to nature-based solutions like wetland filtration and better watershed management. An integrated approach combining infrastructure development, ecosystem conservation, public health interventions, and policy enforcement is essential to reduce the burden of waterborne diseases. Ensuring access to safe water and implementing effective control measures can protect public health and preserve aquatic ecosystem integrity for future generations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".