MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7128235661 · doi:10.47526/3007-8598-2025.1-21

The Importance of Philosophical Knowledge in Shaping Children's Thinking System and Worldview

2025· article· W7128235661 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. Zhanykulov

Bibliographic record

VenueHikmet. · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy of educationCurriculumGlobalizationIdeologySubject (documents)Identity (music)Philosophical methodologyPersonal identity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the moment of birth, a child strives to comprehend and understand the surrounding world, taking the first steps toward philosophical thinking through this cognitive process. However, in today's rapidly developing information society, there are numerous factors that distort children's consciousness, lead to flawed perceptions, and limit their worldview. Therefore, for children, it is important not only to acquire knowledge but also to develop the ability to analyze, evaluate, and think critically. In this regard, philosophy contributes significantly to children's personal development by fostering decision-making skills, comparative and critical thinking, and empathy, helping them to understand their own identity and grow as individuals. Currently, philosophy as a subject is not included in Kazakhstan’s school curriculum. However, drawing on global experience, it is evident that in developed countries such as Western Europe, the USA, Canada, and Australia, philosophical education is systematically implemented at the secondary school level based on the “Philosophy for Children” (P4C) program. Introducing philosophy into the school curriculum contributes not only to the personal development of the child but also to the formation of public consciousness, the strengthening of family relationships, and the cultural and spiritual growth of the country. In this context, the development of philosophy and the promotion of interest in it is a highly important and relevant issue for Kazakh society. Today, Kazakhstan faces various internal and external challenges, including issues in the education system, corruption, social inequality, religious extremism, external ideological influences aimed at weakening national identity, and cultural assimilation within globalization processes. Philosophical education serves as an indispensable spiritual tool to counter such problems. A society with a strong philosophical and national consciousness is more resilient in overcoming global spiritual and existential crises.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHikmet.→Same topicEducation and Critical Thinking Development→French-language works237,207→