MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128244555 · doi:10.1353/jip.00026

Heinz L. and Rowena R. Ansbacher Lecture, 72nd Annual NASAP 2024 Conference: Disrupting Vertical Worldviews in Pursuit of Social Interest

2025· article· en· W7128244555 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Begum Verjee

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œjournal of individual psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInterdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrivilege (computing)Transformative learningPower (physics)Diversity (politics)Social movementSocial activismDemocracy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This Ansbacher Lecture explores vertical worldviews that support the systems of power and privilege that permeate North American society (Canada and the US) and all its institutions. Disrupting these vertical worldviews provides us with a vision for a just and democratic society, as well as a move toward allyship and social equality through a commitment to social interest. I begin this lecture with my cultural biography, followed by a diversity fable and discussion of disrupting vertical worldviews and the necessity for transformative allyship in pursuit of social interest. I end with a story about my daughter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œjournal of individual psychologySame topicInterdisciplinary Cultural and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207