Bibliographic record
Abstract
The bachelor thesis deals with the topic of Quarter-life crisis. The thesis is divided into the theoretical and practical part. The theoretical part deals with key topics focused on crisis, issues of Emerging Adulthood and developmental aspects of young adulthood. The empirical part includes a description of the research group, methodological specifics, research objectives and research questions. The research group consisted of 9 informants concerned with the issue. Qualitative research was used to provide research data, namely semi-structured and unstructured in-depth interviews. Using card unloading techniques, individual thematic categories and research results were presented and explained. All information obtained was compared with the information and knowledge provided by the experts and the information collected in the theoretical part of the research in the final phase. The aim of the thesis was to comprehensively map out the problems of crises and negative experiences of people at the age of 19-32 years. The partial objectives of the research were to find out the perceived causes of the emergence of these crises, the psychological problems accompanying the crisis and the strategies that effectively helped to overcome them. The research results point to a broad spectrum of simultaneous causes of the emergence of crises in this age group. These have both developmental and social and period specificities. Crises are accompanied by feelings of lack of meaning and problems of anxiety and depression. Contact with nature, physical activity, supportive social factors and self-realization have proved to be effective in overcoming the crises and problems associated with them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".