MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128341277

Assessment of analysis of the country character in two areas with different protection of the nature and countryside

2012· dissertation· cs· W7128341277 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Naděžda TRČKOVÁ

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLand Rights and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadastreCharacter (mathematics)Rural areaCzechValue (mathematics)Work (physics)Identification (biology)Natural (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The work concerns with preventive form of assessment of the country character. The assessment includes two areas of interest with different protection of the nature and countryside. Actually we speak about cadastral area of Kaproun and Vícemil. Cadastral area Kaproun is part of Czech Canada natural park and is proclaimed small especially protected area. In cadastral area Vícemil the countryside has quite agricultural character, Essential part of the land is arable. Practical part of the work includes analysis of the country character of these areas of interest. During the analysis an identification of country character features was made. Within actual features their significance, utterance and value were set out. Measure of preservation and esthetic value of the country character followed. On the base of the analysis differences within particular areas we assessed and actual suggestions of increase the value of country character were set out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)Same topicLand Rights and ReformsFrench-language works237,207