Bibliographic record
Abstract
The bachelor work "The Zeis Family in Tábor Public Life" records the history of the town of Tábor in the second half of 19th century. It describes town gradual urbanization and industrialization and at the same time the work tries to refer to the influence of the elite Tábor family. The Zeis family belonged indisputably to the most noticeable Tábor families. Its most important members were Jakub and Emanuel Zeis, father and son, who were involved in Tábor public life since the beginning of the second half of 19th century. Jakub was the first self-governing Mayor of the town in 1850 - 1870 and Emanuel was the third Mayor in 1883 - 1889. Subsequently he was made the head of the district and worked as the district Mayor until he died. In the course of more then fifty years Tábor developed essentially: there has been established Tábor secondary education system, the town became an important South-Bohemian transport junction and industry grew too. During these days the town formed as an exclusively Czech self-governing centre. New societies were being founded, the famous Hussite history was remembered and there has been built a number of monuments to commemorate national heroes. The turning point period around year 1918 concludes the bachelor work. Not only because Emanuel Zeis died in this year but also because of the fact, that year 1918 closes one phase of the national history. The last Chapter describes the town and Zeis family from point of view of an outstanding native of Tábor Emanuel Chalupný. This part of the bachelor work contrasts with the rest of the work as attitude of Emanuel Chalupný to the Zeis Family is really impossibly to be assessed as positive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".