MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128372902 · doi:10.5962/p.297400

Weeds of the arbor in Western Australia

2010· article· W7128372902 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory John Keighery

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Australian naturalist · 2010
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsDepartment of Environment and Conservation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeedAlienWeed controlVegetation (pathology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 2009 survey of weeds on the southern Nullarbor listed 98 species.This is an increase of 20 species over the number previously recorded.The most serious weeds of the region are Wards Weed (Carrichterra annua), Prickly Turnip {Brassica tournefortii), Annual Veld Grass (Ehrharta longiflora) and Box Thorn ( Lycium ferocissimum).New weeds appear to be mainly spreading via the road network and more regular surveys may uncover potentially serious weeds be¬ fore they spread.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern Australian naturalistSame topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207