MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128443752 · doi:10.7202/1122188ar

Manières d’être mutant : métamorphose et hybridation comme prise de pouvoir des « faibles » dans <i>Game of Thrones</i>

2025· article· fr· W7128443752 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bruno Vergnes

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)Process (computing)Context (archaeology)Identity (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une analyse de la série Game of Thrones à travers la notion de mutation, envisagée comme une dynamique de prise de pouvoir. Nous analysons deux tropes de la transformation pour montrer que la série oppose la métamorphose spectaculaire de Daenerys à l’hybridation chamanique de Bran, cette dernière apparaissant comme une alternative aux structures de pouvoir traditionnelles. À travers une approche philosophique et anthropologique, nous interrogeons la manière dont Game of Thrones met en scène une recomposition des frontières entre l’humain et le non-humain, ouvrant ainsi une réflexion sur les formes contemporaines du pouvoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littérairesSame topicMigration and Exile StudiesFrench-language works237,207