Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte explore la transformation du droit des renseignements personnels face aux revendications d’intérêt général. Il souligne un changement de paradigme où les renseignements personnels ne sont plus uniquement des droits de nature individualiste, mais également des vecteurs d’intérêt général grâce à leur utilisation accrue pour la recherche. Cette évolution entraîne une diversification du droit des renseignements personnels, où protection de la vie privée et utilisation secondaire deviennent complémentaires, promouvant l’innovation sociale. Toutefois, cette socialisation des renseignements personnels crée de plus grandes attentes en matière de confiance et d’acceptabilité sociale que le droit des renseignements personnels n’a pas encore pleinement intégrées. Cela remet également en question la capacité du droit des renseignements personnels à refléter fidèlement la profondeur de la relation que toute personne concernée entretient avec ses renseignements personnels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".