Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of food security is dynamic and ever-changing. This article tries to highlight the concept of food security and its changing dimensions with respect to space and time. The article examines the shift of the concept from aggregate food availability, which is a function of domestic agricultural production, trade and food aid focusing on the supply side, to food accessibility which is a function of income or purchasing power focusing on the demand side. The analysis here also incorporates other dimensions of food security such as food stability, food utilization, food vulnerability, food sustainability, risk measurement, anthropometry, etc. Moreover, apart from providing a comprehensive picture of the evolution of the different dimensions of food security historically, the present article also tries to present the involution of the concept of food security in such a way the that it can be easily understood. Also reviewed here are the indicators and measurement processes that are currently being used by scholars of different organizations and institutions for the analysis of food security. The article concludes that the concept of food security is a dynamic and vital phenomenon and there is no benchmark or standard method to measure food security. Thus, researchers and policy makers should very judiciously choose the indicators while keeping in mind what dimension of food security they are going to deal with.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".