MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128473986 · doi:10.64903/1480-6800.24.1.25

Patterns of Mediation in Conflict Resolution in the Arab World

2021· article· W7128473986 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nahla Yassine-Hamdan

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2021
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConflict Management and Negotiation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMediationGeopoliticsConflict resolutionTransformative mediationPerspective (graphical)Set (abstract data type)Party-directed mediationProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given the geopolitical significance of the Middle East region and the high incidence of domestic and international conflict in the post-Arab Spring era—it is imperative that we revisit the importance of mediation in conflict resolution. Through holistic analysis of the reconciliation and the process of mediation in the Arab world, this article will address and shed fresh light on the specificity of mediation in the Arab world. It will also highlight the significance of cultural variables that impact the success or failure of mediation. Lessons learned and how a mediation process can develop in Arab society will set the parameters and introduce a new perspective into formulating a long-term sustainable solution to intractable conflicts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicConflict Management and NegotiationFrench-language works237,207