Urban Planning in Crisis: Urban Fact between Sprawl and Control in Sétif, Algeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rapid urbanization in Algeria is at odds with the pre-existing spatial structure of the city and its social evolution. The points of rupture, in most cases out of step with the urban plan, can be read through the different modalities and rhythms of an ‘urban fact’. The urban fact and urbanization characterize a situation and a spontaneous evolution and are opposed to urbanism, which implies a voluntary and planned intervention. The methodology of approach in the present study is based on a retrospective reading of the city of Sétif in Algeria, through two aspects of urbanization: spatial evolution and urban densification. These two dimensions characterize the urban fact that the city of Sétif has to date endured, and has become vulnerable. This is mainly due to the absence of good urban governance and a succession of inconsistent policies, actions and circumstances. The aim of this study is to highlight the shortcomings of operative urban practice since Algerian independence on up to the present day. Urban planning now is in crisis. The goal here is to participate in the overhaul of the legislation on urban planning, putting the necessary markers so as to advance in changing the practices of planning and urban management adapted to territorial equity in the face of socioeconomic changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".