Re-visiting the ‘Green Line’ 2022: The Legacy of a Non-existing Border on Israeli Maps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper seeks to place the Green Line boundary superimposed on the landscape of Palestine in 1949 as an Armistice Line within the context of a broader discussion, combining Israel’s alleged special needs for ‘security’ with that of its colonial activities manifested in land grab beyond its sovereign space, a national territory created in the wake of an-Nakba War of 1948. The Separation Wall (SW) erected by Israel to the east of the Green Line from 2002 on overlaps with the Green Line by only some 15%. The remaining length of 85% of the SW penetrates deep inside the West Bank up to a distance of 22 km. Arguably Israel’s aim for constructing this Wall, along with the promulgation of the restrictive gate-system regulations for local Palestinians and their movement, is meant to dispossess Palestinian landowners and increase its continuous state territory further to the east. The then US President’s Deal of the Century (DoC) proposal in January 2020 clashes with international law and relevant UN resolutions pertaining to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. However, it was warmly welcomed by the right-wing government at the time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".