MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128531225 · doi:10.64903/1480-6800.23.1.45

The Deal of the Century in Context – Trump's Plan is Part of a Long-Standing Settler-Colonial Enterprise in Palestine

2020· article· W7128531225 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
As’ad Ghanem

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2020
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousHomelandPalestineContext (archaeology)Identity (music)Argument (complex analysis)Plan (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main argument of this article is that Trump's “Deal of the Century” (DoC) is part of a continuing settler-colonial project to transform Palestine and its identity from an Arab-Palestinian homeland into a Jewish-Zionist one. The settler-colonial enterprise includes an attempt to change the existing reality and to replace it with a new reality that accepts settlers, through diverse techniques implemented towards the indigenous people, such as deportation, disregard, absenteeism, and confinement within closed reservations, which weaken the ability of the indigenous people to resist. Trump's DoC – in terms of the content of the Plan, the identity of the designers of the Plan, its form of declaration, and the contents of the speeches given at the White House meeting on January 28, 2020 – is an additional event in a contin­uing series of past events. These have sought, by means of a prior declaration, to serve as an international cover to control Palestine and to change its territory and demography. They do so while ignoring the Palestinian reality formed over hundreds of years, and seek to enhance the erasure of this reality and to create a new one by imposing a settler-colonial enterprise which gives the settlers structural superiority over the indigenous people of Palestine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207