Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colonization and settlement of the Palestinian West Bank by the State of Israel has converted vast portions of the West Bank landscape into the status of “Israel Lands” — lands under the control of the Jewish State and Jewish Israeli settlers. As more and more of the land surface in the West Bank succumbs to the land hunger of Israeli colonization and settlement, an ever-expanding share of the Palestinian landscape is rendered off-limits to Palestinians. In the shrunken spaces on the landscape remaining for Palestinians, the State of Israel has established a tightly restricted system of control over Palestinian mobility in which freedom of movement is severely curtailed. The argument in this article is that the landscape, with its expanse of impassible spaces and tight controls over mobility constitutes a prison-like regime of confinement on the land. Policed by the Israeli military and reinforced by a host of physical barriers to free movement built into the landscape, this confinement system also imposes strict controls on Palestinian mobility from the violence and vigilantism of Israeli settlers. This article reveals how Palestinians experience this confinement regime on the ground level in two case studies, the agricultural village of Iraq Burin and the city of Al-Khalil (Hebron), and emphasizes how photography can be mobilized as a method alongside ethnography to tell this story.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".