MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128540465 · doi:10.64903/1480-6800.23.2.217

SPOT Imagery Observation on Mangrove Changes Using NDVI Density Analysis: The Case of Sepang Besar River, Malaysia

2020· article· W7128540465 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammad Yazrin Yasin, Nisfariza Mohd Noor, Mariney Mohd Yusoff, Jamalunlaili Abdullah, Norzailawati Mohd Noor

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2020
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMangroveNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexUrbanizationLand coverLand useVegetation (pathology)Biodiversity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mangrove forests are confined by river basins and play a role as a hotspot of biodiversity while acting to prevent erosion in the river-coastal system. However, mangroves are changing rapidly at present, driven by urbanization and land use land cover transformation. Similar to other types of vegetation, the mangrove has a unique spectral characteristic that can be distinguished by remote sensing technology. Vegetation indices has been utilized for mangrove change detection and SPOT imagery provide the right spectral and spatial resolution in achieving it. The present study aimed to examine the changes of vegetation index density classes of primary mangrove areas between the year 2009 and 2019 in Sungai Sepang Besar, Sepang Malaysia. The process includes image acquisition, accuracy assessment, ground truthing, and NDVI density analysis. The results show changes in density, types and total areas of mangroves that relate to rapid urbanization and substantial land use transformation of the surrounding areas for the past 25 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsFrench-language works237,207