MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128540988 · doi:10.64903/1480-6800-28.2.89

Resilience Capacities and Liveability in Algiers: A Morphological Approach

2025· article· W7128540988 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Assia Fernini-Haffif, Naima Chabbi-Chemrouk

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban heat islandUrban morphologyResilience (materials science)Urban climateClimate changeUrban resiliencePsychological resilienceAdaptive capacityUrban planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cities in North Africa are increasingly affected by extreme urban heat due to climate change and excessive urbanization. Monitoring Land Surface Temperature (LST) and its interactions with urban morphology reveals significant impacts on urban comfort and quality of life, as identified by the Lively City Index (LCI). In this paper, Algiers with its extreme temperature 40 to 45°C and an LCI negatively correlated with LST is used as a case study to develop an analytical methodology linking LST distribution, spectral indices, liveability, and urban morphology to improve urban resilience and liveability. The methodology is based mainly on the use of LST mapping drawn from satellite images to evaluate aspects of urban morphology that mitigate heat effects and help enhance liveability. Based on the significant negative correlation between NDBI and LST, the study demonstrates that urban morphology plays a crucial role in thermal comfort. It also shows that morphological adaptation capacity depends on the level of absorption capacity and the identification of existing adaptation potentials to establish urban resilience to heat and improve liveability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207