MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128552287 · doi:10.64903/1480-6800-28.2.106

Contribution of Palm Grove Ecosystem Services in the Establishment and Sustainability of Rural Settlements Threatened by Spatial and Social Transformations in Adrar Province, Algeria

2025· article· W7128552287 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Malika Brahimi, Mohamed Hadeid, Benbader Habib, Boudjema Sehl, Fathi Abdellatif Belhouadjeb

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWater management and technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityEcosystem servicesThreatened speciesPopulationHuman settlementAgriculturePromotion (chess)BushmeatWork (physics)Citizen journalism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research focuses on the relationship between inhabitants and their environment in the extreme conditions of the desert, and the ways in which the community has organized itself for centuries to confront its weaknesses in the Adrar region. We have relied on participatory observation, and on knowledge in the human sciences and economics to highlight the diverse ecosystem services and goods provided by the palm grove and the lengthy list of its beneficiaries. Our work has also sought to go into the details of the Ksourian society, marked by a mutual solidarity that symbolizes the Ksourian identity, rarely found in such conditions anywhere other than in authentic ancient societies. Finally, we have presented a brief description of some aspects of the housing programmes that the state has implemented in order to improve the well-being of the population and its quality of life in terms of rural housing and the promotion of agricultural activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicWater management and technologiesFrench-language works237,207