MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128558241

Cognitive Styles In Student Use, Perception, And Satisfaction With Online Learning

2007· article· W7128558241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) · 2007
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicLearning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive stylePerceptionCognitionPreferenceOnline learningThe InternetLocus of controlStyle (visual arts)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current trend toward online learning significantly changes the paradigm for teaching and learning. While instructors structure and sequence how they teach in a traditional face-to-face classroom, the very nature of online learning shifts the locus of control from the instructor to the learner, as the student picks and chooses how and when they access the course, what aspects they dwell on, and for how long. As a result, a need exists to investigate how different students respond to the online interface. This study conducted at a small Canadian mid-western university was designed to investigate whether a relationship existed between students' cognitive style preferences and their comfort, use, and satisfaction with the online learning environment. The impetus driving this study was largely due to the scarcity of empirical research relating perceptual modality preferences to online learning. The majority of Internet sites do a good job of presenting information visually; however, students with a dominant visual preference represent only 3% of the population. Therefore, without looking at students' cognitive style preferences as they relate to online learning, the medium is neither being used to its fullest, nor are learners receiving the full potential of online learning. The study (n = 94) looked at two aspects of cognitive style preferences: perceptual modality and field independence/dependence. This study found that student perceptual modality preferences were significant for all three research questions (i.e., students' comfort, use, and satisfaction with WebCT). There was a negative correlation between those with auditory preferences and their comfort and use of WebCT. Conversely, there was a positive correlation between students' kinesthetic preferences and their comfort and use of WebCT. With regard to field independent/dependent students, the only relationship this study found was a negative correlation between field dependent learners and their comfort with both the downloading of files and conversion between different files types. The significance of this study lies in providing preliminary insight into how students with different cognitive preferences respond to online learning, and may provide a basis to improve the quality of online learning for students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it