MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128596347 · doi:10.7202/1122999ar

Efficience et disponibilité des protections offertes aux personnes proches aidantes en emploi

2025· article· fr· W7128596347 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Vicky Lamarche

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversité urbaine · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConciliationJurisprudence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Canada, plus de six millions de travailleuses et travailleurs agissent à titre de personne proche aidante parallèlement à leurs responsabilités professionnelles (Gouvernement du Canada, 2016). Les défis qui en découlent amènent certaines personnes à quitter leur emploi ou le marché du travail, faute d’accommodement. Cette recherche vise à identifier les lois qui encadrent et protègent le lien d’emploi des personnes proches aidantes au Canada. Un examen de sources documentaires a permis d’identifier la jurisprudence propre à la conciliation entre la proche aidance et l’emploi. L’analyse montre que les protections ne sont pas uniformes partout au pays. Les gestionnaires peuvent aller au-delà de leurs obligations légales, en offrant volontairement des mesures de conciliation pour répondre plus efficacement aux besoins de la main-d’oeuvre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversité urbaineSame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207