MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128606088 · doi:10.7202/1111946arcopiedan

Ancrage au terrain dans l’accompagnement de personnes enseignantes par des conseillères et conseillers pédagogiques en mathématiques au primaire

2023· article· fr· W7128606088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lily Bacon

Bibliographic record

VenueDIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Vocational educationContext (archaeology)Data collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Québec, les conseillères et conseillers pédagogiques (CPs) interviennent auprès des personnes enseignantes comme des «expertes et experts-conseils» en pédagogie et en intervention. Huit CPs en mathématiques au primaire ont été impliqués dans une recherche collaborative (RC) autour de leur travail d’accompagnement pour la résolution de problèmes mathématiques en classe. Les accompagnements rapportés par les CPs ont été analysés sous l’angle des concepts de problématisation et de didactiques plurielles révélant leurs manières diverses d’ancrer leurs actions sur le terrain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIAL (Catholic University of Leuven)Same topicMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesFrench-language works237,207