Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eudocima materna (Linnaeus, 1767) * (Fig. 35) COMMON NAME(S): Dot Underwing, Fruitpiercing moth SYNONYM(S): Noctua hybrida Fabricius, 1775; Ophideres chalcogramma Walker, 1865c. IUCN STATUS: Not Evaluated (NE). DISTRIBUTION: Australia, Brazil, Cameroon, Canada, Caribbean islands, Chile, Costa Rica, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ecuador, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Fiji, French Guiana, French Polynesia, Gambia, Ghana, India, Indonesia (Java), Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mexico, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, New Caledonia, New Guinea, New Zealand, Nigeria, Oman, Pacific Islands, Pakistan, Rwanda, Sao Tome & Principe, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Uganda, USA (Florida, Louisiana, Minnesota, Texas, Oklahoma), Tanzania, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe. LOCALITY IN ZAMBIA: Mwinilunga, in Northwestern Province; Ndola, in Copperbelt Province; University of Zambia Campus ** in Lusaka and Kafue **, both localities in Lusaka Province; Othreis materna (Linnaeus, 1758) collected Barotseland area or Western Province. LARVAL HOSTPLANT(S): Host plants of the taxon include three Menispermaceae species (Dioscoreophyllum cumminsii Diels, Rhigiocarya racemifera Miers and Tiliacora sp.) in Ghana (Forsyth 1966) and one Rosaceae species (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch or Peach) in South Africa (Prinsloo & Uys 2015). Additionally, the African Moths (2019) webpage lists the following as larval foodplants of the taxon; two Menispermaceae species (Cocculus sp. and Tinospora caffra), one Solanaceae species (Lycopersicon sp.; one Rosaceae species (Malus pumila Mill.), one Anacardiaceae species (Mangifera indica L.), one Musaceae species (Musa paradisiaca subsp. sapientum (L.) Kuntze ex K.Schum.), and one Vitaceae species (Vitis sp.). SOURCES: De Prins & De Prins 2022; Hampson 1910c.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".