A Survey of Patients in the Whitehorse Division of General Practice: 2000
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Health status profiles of a population can be useful for planning purposes. In 2000, the Whitehorse Division of General Practice commissioned The Centre for Health Programme Evaluation at The University of Melbourne to provide such a profile of their patients, together with some assessment of the extent of loneliness and social isolation in that community. This Research Report is the account of that survey: it reports the use of the SF-36 to assess health status and of the specifically designed Solitariness Scale to assess social isolation, and the findings of the survey. The limitations associated with the study design are identified; and the findings are discussed with respect to relevant evidence from the literature, and the relationship between the results of each tool for sub-groups of the population. This information should add to the knowledge of their community already present within the Whitehorse Division, and prove useful in planning future services to target particular needs within the population they serve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it