Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COLLOQUY: text theory critique Issue 12, November 2006 <br> <i>Be true to the earth</i> guest edited by Kate Rigby with Samantha Capon, Peter C. Coleman, Barbara Ghattas<br>-----Issue 12 of<i> Colloquy: text theory critique</i> publishes the proceedings of the conference<i> Be true to the earth</i>, which took place at Monash University on March 31-April 1, 2005 and which was co-organized by <i>Colloquy</i>. The collection of papers, edited by Samantha Capon, Peter Coleman, Barbara Ghattas and Kate Rigby, focuses on eco-criticism and eco-philosophy and contains articles on a wide range of topics, from Nietzsche to Patrick White, from Orwell to Judith Wright, from landscape and poetry to earth-based ethics. A number of people made possible the realization of this issue, first and foremost the referees who reviewed the articles and whom the editors want to thank.<br>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it