L’épanouissement au-delà des épreuves : perspectives sur la croissance post-traumatique au sein des communautés universitaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur la croissance post-traumatique des membres de la communauté universitaire en temps de pandémie. Il s’appuie sur une étude mixte réalisée du mois d’avril 2020 au mois d’avril 2022, auprès de 5 407 personnes étudiantes et employées dans 12 universités du Québec. Un sondage en ligne, comprenant des questions quantitatives et qualitatives, a permis d’explorer les changements positifs liés au contexte pandémique. Les résultats quantitatifs indiquent des niveaux de croissance post-traumatique relativement peu élevés. Toutefois, les réponses qualitatives indiquent que les personnes sondées ont vécu des changements positifs, voir transformateurs, dans les cinq dimensions de la croissance post-traumatique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".