Deterministic factorization of constant-depth algebraic circuits in subexponential time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While efficient randomized algorithms for factorization of polynomials given by algebraic circuits have been known for decades, obtaining an even slightly non-trivial deterministic algorithm for this problem has remained an open question of great interest. This is true even when the input algebraic circuit has additional structure, for instance, when it is a constant-depth circuit. Indeed, no efficient deterministic algorithms are known even for the seemingly easier problem of factoring sparse polynomials or even the problem of testing the irreducibility of sparse polynomials.In this work, we make progress on these questions: we design a deterministic algorithm that runs in subexponential time, and when given as input a constant-depth algebraic circuit C over the field of rational numbers, it outputs algebraic circuits (of potentially unbounded depth) for all the irreducible factors of C, together with their multiplicities. In particular, we give the first subexponential time deterministic algorithm for factoring sparse polynomials.For our proofs, we rely on a finer understanding of the structure of power series roots of constant-depth circuits and the analysis of the Kabanets-Impagliazzo generator. In particular, we show that the Kabanets-Impagliazzo generator constructed using low-degree hard polynomials (explicitly constructed in the work of Limaye, Srinivasan & Tavenas) preserves not only the non-zeroness of small constant-depth circuits (as shown by Chou, Kumar & Solomon), but also their irreducibility and the irreducibility of their factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".