Generalized Flow in Nearly-linear Time on Moderately Dense Graphs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we consider generalized flow problems where there is an m-edge n-node directed graph $G=(V, E)$ and each edge $e \in E$ has a loss factor $\gamma_{e}\gt 0$ governing whether the flow is increased or decreased as it crosses edge e. We provide a randomized $\widetilde{O}\left(\left(m+n^{1.5}\right) \cdot \operatorname{polylog}\left(\frac{W}{\delta}\right)\right)$ time algorithm for solving the generalized maximum flow and generalized minimum cost flow problems in this setting where $\delta$ is the target accuracy and W is the maximum of all costs, capacities, and loss factors and their inverses. This improves upon the previous state-of-the-art $\widetilde{O}\left(m \sqrt{n} \cdot \log ^{2}\left(\frac{W}{\delta}\right)\right)$ time algorithm, obtained by combining the algorithm of [17] with techniques from [29]. To obtain this result we provide new dynamic data structures and spectral results regarding the matrices associated to generalized flows and apply them through the interior point method framework of [39].1.1The full version of this paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17740.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".