Generalized Flow in Nearly-linear Time on Moderately Dense Graphs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we consider generalized flow problems where there is an m-edge n-node directed graph $G=(V, E)$ and each edge $e \in E$ has a loss factor $\gamma_{e}\gt 0$ governing whether the flow is increased or decreased as it crosses edge e. We provide a randomized $\widetilde{O}\left(\left(m+n^{1.5}\right) \cdot \operatorname{polylog}\left(\frac{W}{\delta}\right)\right)$ time algorithm for solving the generalized maximum flow and generalized minimum cost flow problems in this setting where $\delta$ is the target accuracy and W is the maximum of all costs, capacities, and loss factors and their inverses. This improves upon the previous state-of-the-art $\widetilde{O}\left(m \sqrt{n} \cdot \log ^{2}\left(\frac{W}{\delta}\right)\right)$ time algorithm, obtained by combining the algorithm of [17] with techniques from [29]. To obtain this result we provide new dynamic data structures and spectral results regarding the matrices associated to generalized flows and apply them through the interior point method framework of [39].<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup>.<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup>The full version of this paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17740.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it