MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128722255 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/tca4u

Context-Dependent Relationships between Street-level Heat Island Effect, the Sky View Factor, and Landscape Pattern: Examples from the Coastal City of Vancouver, Canada

2025· article· W7128722255 on OpenAlexaffabout
Baifei Ren

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban heat islandGeographically Weighted RegressionGrasslandSkyUrban planningSea breezeSpatial ecologyGrid systemCommon spatial pattern

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research focuses on street-level Sky View Factor (SVF), exploring which areas in coastal city, Vancouver, might see street-level SVF play the most significant role in influencing UHI. Additionally, it explores other indicators of landscape patterns outside of streets that impact UHI intensity. This study establishes multiple-ring buffers and two grid scales, namely 150m×150m and 900m×900m fishnet to analyze spatial heterogeneity of the research area. Using OLS, geographically weighted regression (GWR), and multiscale GWR (MGWR), it analyzes the influence of various indicators of urban morphology on UHI intensity. Our study found a positive correlation between SVF and UHI intensity, consistent with previous research. However, in areas closer to the coast, SVF is insignificant, while distance to the sea has a greater impact on UHI intensity. Additionally, green space provides stronger heat island mitigation at small scales, but landscape patterns of urban grassland are less effective than dense forest areas both at city-wide and more local scales. Finally, based on the research conclusions, some location-specific planning and design recommendations were proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207